Improving the Safety and Quality of Building Materials Based on the Assessment of Experience and Business Reputation of the Enterprise

At present, to improve the quality of building materials, products and structures, it is proposed to use the existing methods of regulating the “manufacturer – builder” relationship. At the same time, there is a possibility that the introduction of new tightening measures of influence by the state in the form of burdensome mandatory confirmation of compliance of products can lead to the opposite effect – a decrease in quality. At the same time, the formation of a quality control system with due regard for the assessment of the experience and business reputation of manufacturers of construction products will increase the transparency of the market, functioning on the trust principles. This approach meets the European principles of entry into the market of construction products and contributes to the development of healthy competition, the elimination of unscrupulous manufacturers, reducing the volume of counterfeit and falsified construction products.

Yu.V. PUKHARENKO, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Corresponding member of RAACS (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
V.D. STAROVEROV, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering)
A.A. GERASIMENKO, student

St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (4, 2-d Krasnoarmeyskaya st., St. Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation)

1. Inspections have to borrow in activity less and less weight. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3873378 (Date of access 27.02.2019). (In Russian).
2. Yavorskii A.A., Martos V.V., Voitovich V.A. System approach to ensuring quality of concrete works on the building site.Concrete and reinforced concrete – a prospection: scientific works of III All-Russian (II International) conferences on concrete and reinforced concrete.Moscow: 2014. Vol. 4, pp. 383–391. (In Russian).
3. Certification did not solve a cement falsification problem – the expert. https://www.radidomapro.ru/ryedktzij/proyzvodsvo-materialov/stroymateriali/sertifikatziia-ne-reschila-problemu-faligsifikatzi-63315.php (Date of access 27.02.2019). (In Russian).
4. What did obligatory certification of cement as it stands for the industry bring? http://dom.iastr.ru/biznes/1418-chto-prinesla-obyazatelnaya-sertifikaciya-cementa-v-nyneshnem-vide-dlya-otrasli.html (Date of access 25.02.2019). (In Russian).
5. Chetverik N.P. What kind of construction control do we need, or toothlessness is not needed by the construction community.Stroitel’nye Materialy, oborudovanie, teknologii XXI veka.2012. No. 9 (164), pp. 43–45. (In Russian).
6. Chetverik N.P. Construction compliance monitoring as analog of the state construction supervision.Stroitel’nye Materialy, oborudovanie, teknologii XXI veka.2012. No. 11 (166), pp. 46–49. (In Russian).
7. Bal’kin V.M. Construction compliance monitoring and building security.Vestnik SGASU. Gradostroitel’stvo I arkhitektura.2013. No. 3 (11), pp. 40–41. (In Russian).
8. Chetverik N.P. Laboratory control within construction control as the security system basis in construction.Stroitel’nye Materialy, oborudovanie, teknologii XXI veka.2011. No. 5 (148), pp. 23–24. (In Russian).
9. The annual report on activity of Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision in 2017. Federal Service for Environmental, Technological and Nuclear Supervision. Moscow. 2018. 420 p. (In Russian).
10. Ermolina A.Yu. Selection of suppliers of material and technical resources in construction organizations.Ekonomicheskie nauki.2009. No. 8 (57), pp. 307–311. (In Russian).