AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
The development of the Northern and Arctic regions is hindered by unfavorable engineering and geological conditions. Therefore, an urgent task is to introduce innovative technologies in construction that improve the physical and mechanical properties of dispersed soils. There are various ways to strengthen and stabilize soils, but the most widely used are combined physical and chemical methods that make it possible to create structures with specified performance characteristics by the type of soil concrete. Preliminary studies have shown the effectiveness of using an additive based on glyoxal to strengthen aluminosilicate (sandy and clay) soils of road bases and utilities. The developed composition on the basis of sand, saponite-containing material, glyoxal and fine bark, based on the studied mechanism of topochemical interaction between the components, can be considered as a model of soil-concrete based on a polymer-organic binder. The non-traditional binder is a system of mechanically activated bark – glyoxal, and the filler is a mixture of polymineral sand and saponite-containing material, characterized by quantitative variation of the latter and providing the creation of a model system of clay soil with a given number of plasticity. However, there is currently no assessment of the contribution of the main parameters of topochemical interaction to the structure-forming properties of the polymer-organic binder, and the influence of prescription and technological factors on the properties of the final composite is not determined. The purpose of the study presented in this paper was to test a scientifically based methodology for assessing the influence of chemical and physico-chemical factors on the structure formation of a polymer-organic binder, to identify the maximum possible synergistic effect and to determine the ranges of variation in the content of components. To characterize the influence of the chemical factor, the amount of glyoxal was chosen, expressed in terms of the ratio of the polarization component of the surface tension of the Cora-glyoxal system after completion of the polycondensation reaction, determined by the Ounce-Wendt-Rabel - Kjellble method to the initial concentration of glyoxal; for the physico-chemical factor, the number of active centers, expressed in terms of the specific surface area of the mechanoactivated bark. The compressive strength of the composite and its moisture resistance, characterized by a conditional softening coefficient, were chosen as structurally sensitive properties. The dependences of the influence of prescription and technological factors on the properties of the final composite are established. The compressive strength is most affected by the physical and chemical factor, and the moisture resistance is most affected by the chemical factor. The principles of controlling the processes of polymer-organic binder structure formation are developed. Obtaining soil concrete with the required strength characteristics should be carried out by controlling the specific surface area of the mechanically activated bark; and achieving a given degree of moisture resistance – by varying the concentration of glyoxal.
Yu.V. SOKOLOVA1, Engineer (Assistant) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.),
A.M. AYZENSHTADT1, Doctor of Sciences (Chemistry), Professor (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.);
E.V. KOROLEV2, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Professor (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.);
A.A. CHIBISOV1, Master student (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
A.M. AYZENSHTADT1, Doctor of Sciences (Chemistry), Professor (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.);
E.V. KOROLEV2, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering), Professor (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.);
A.A. CHIBISOV1, Master student (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
1 Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (17, Severnaya Dvina Embankment, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation)
2 St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (4, 2-nd Krasnoarmeyskaya Street, St. Petersburg, 190005, Russian Federation)
1. Murashova E.G., Kissel E.K. Engineering-geological properties of clayey soils. Regional aspects of the development of science and education in the field of architecture, construction, land planning and cadastres at the beginning of the III-rd millennium: Materials of the V-th International scientific and practical conference. Komsomolsk-on-Amur. 2018. pp. 157–160. (In Russian).
2. Osipov V.I., Karpenko F.S., Kalbergenov R.G., Kutergin V.N., Rumyantseva N.A. Rheological properties of the clay soils. Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya Geologiya, Gidrogeologiya, Geokriologiya. 2017. No. 6, pp. 41–51. (In Russian).
3. Pourakbar S., Huat B. A review of alternatives traditional cementitious binders for engineering improvement of soils. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 2, pp. 206–2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1207042
4. Rahgozar M., Saberian M., Li J. Soil stabilization with non-conventional eco-friendly agricultural waste materials: An experimental study. Transportation Geotechnics. 2018. Vol. 14, pp. 52–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.09.004
5. Firoozi A., Guney Olgun C., Firoozi A., Baghini M. Fundamentals of soil stabilization. International Journal of Geo-Engineering. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 26, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0064-9
6. Hudaykulov R.M., Mirzayev T.L. The use of stabilizers to improve the strength of the soil foundation of roads. Transportnye Sooruzheniya. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 1, pp. 12. (In Russian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15862/14SATS119
7. Lazorenko G.I. Technologies for stabilizing clay soils using nanomaterials. Inzhenernyi Vestnik Dona. 2018. No. 1 (48), pp. 107. (In Russian).
8. Bezrodnykh A.A., Nelyubova V.V., Strokova V.V., Belyaev A.V., Dmitrieva T.V. Terminological aspects of soils reinforcement. Engineering tasks: problems and solutions: Papers of the All-Russian (national) scientific-practical conference of the Higher School of Engineering in NArFU. Arkhangelsk. 2019, pp. 66–68. (In Russian).
9. Bezrodnykh A.A., Dmitrieva T.V. The use of soil concrete in road construction. Innovative materials and technologies in design: Abstracts of the V-th All-Russian scientific-practical conference with the participation of young people. St. Petersburg. 2019. pp. 84–85. (In Russian).
10. Trautvain A.I., Akimov A.E., Chernogil V.B. Study of physical and mechanical characteristics of various types of soil strengthened by clinker waste. Stroitel’nye Materialy i Izdeliya. 2018. Vol. 1. No. 3, pp. 43–50. (In Russian).
11. Dmitrieva T.V., Kucyna N.P., Bezrodnykh A.A., Strokova V.V., Markova I.Yu. Efficiency of reinforcement of technological soil by mineral modifiers. Vestnik Belgorodskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnologicheskogo Universiteta im. V.G. Shukhova. 2019. No. 7, pp. 14–23. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34031/article_5d14bdcc8eca43.21244159
12. Gayda Yu.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M., Malkov V.S., Fomchenkov M.A. Organic mineral additive for strengthening sandy soils. Promyshlennoe i Grazhdanskoe Stroitel’stvo. 2015. No. 11, pp. 25–29. (In Russian).
13. Sokolova Yu.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M. Evaluation of dispersion interaction in aluminum silicate system under the influence of organic additive. Fizika i Khimiya Obrabotki Materialov. 2017. No. 4, pp. 83–88. (In Russian).
14. Sokolova Y.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M., Frolova M.A., Strokova V.V. Kinetic description of heterogeneous processes using surface tension as an information parameter. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1400. Iss. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1400/7/077054
15. Danilov V.E., Korolev E.V., Aizenshtadt A.M., Strokova V.V. Features of the calculation of free energy of the surface based on the model for interfacial interaction of Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble. Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction Materials]. 2019. No. 11, pp. 66–72. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2019-776-11-66-72
16. Ariawan D., Mohd Ishak Z.A., Salim M.S., Mat Taib R., Ahmad Thirmizir M.Z. Wettability and interfacial characterization of alkaline treated kenaf fiber-unsaturated polyester composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. Polymer Composites. 2017. Vol. 38. Iss. 3, pp. 507–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23609
17. Sun X., Mei C., French A.D., Wang Y., Wu Q. Surface wetting behavior of nanocellulose-based composite films. Cellulose. 2018. Vol. 25. No. 9, pp. 5071–5087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1927-8
18. Wang C., Xian Y., Smith L.M., Cheng H., Zhang S. Interfacial properties of bamboo fiber-reinforced high-density polyethylene composites by different methods for adding nano calcium carbonate. Polymers. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 11, pp. 587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9110587
19. Pokrovskaya E.N., Portnov F.A. Thermodynamic optimization of modifiers of the surface layer of wood. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost’. 2017. Vol. 26. No. 5, pp. 29–36. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18322/PVB.2017.26.05.29-36
20. Gusev B.V., Grishina A.N., Korolev E.V. Characteristics of the structure formation of gypsum binder modified with zinc hydrosilicates. Promyshlen-noe i Grazhdanskoe Stroitel’stvo. 2020. No. 2, pp. 40–46. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33622/0869-7019.2020.02.40-46
21. Gayda J.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M., Tutygin A.S., Frolova M.A. Organic-Mineral Aggregate for Sandy Subsoil Strengthening. The 3rd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics: Procedia Engineering, Advances in Transportation Geotechnics 3. Guimaraes. 2016. Vol. 143, pp. 90–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.012
2. Osipov V.I., Karpenko F.S., Kalbergenov R.G., Kutergin V.N., Rumyantseva N.A. Rheological properties of the clay soils. Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya Geologiya, Gidrogeologiya, Geokriologiya. 2017. No. 6, pp. 41–51. (In Russian).
3. Pourakbar S., Huat B. A review of alternatives traditional cementitious binders for engineering improvement of soils. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2017. Vol. 11. No. 2, pp. 206–2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1207042
4. Rahgozar M., Saberian M., Li J. Soil stabilization with non-conventional eco-friendly agricultural waste materials: An experimental study. Transportation Geotechnics. 2018. Vol. 14, pp. 52–60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.09.004
5. Firoozi A., Guney Olgun C., Firoozi A., Baghini M. Fundamentals of soil stabilization. International Journal of Geo-Engineering. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 26, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0064-9
6. Hudaykulov R.M., Mirzayev T.L. The use of stabilizers to improve the strength of the soil foundation of roads. Transportnye Sooruzheniya. 2019. Vol. 6. No. 1, pp. 12. (In Russian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15862/14SATS119
7. Lazorenko G.I. Technologies for stabilizing clay soils using nanomaterials. Inzhenernyi Vestnik Dona. 2018. No. 1 (48), pp. 107. (In Russian).
8. Bezrodnykh A.A., Nelyubova V.V., Strokova V.V., Belyaev A.V., Dmitrieva T.V. Terminological aspects of soils reinforcement. Engineering tasks: problems and solutions: Papers of the All-Russian (national) scientific-practical conference of the Higher School of Engineering in NArFU. Arkhangelsk. 2019, pp. 66–68. (In Russian).
9. Bezrodnykh A.A., Dmitrieva T.V. The use of soil concrete in road construction. Innovative materials and technologies in design: Abstracts of the V-th All-Russian scientific-practical conference with the participation of young people. St. Petersburg. 2019. pp. 84–85. (In Russian).
10. Trautvain A.I., Akimov A.E., Chernogil V.B. Study of physical and mechanical characteristics of various types of soil strengthened by clinker waste. Stroitel’nye Materialy i Izdeliya. 2018. Vol. 1. No. 3, pp. 43–50. (In Russian).
11. Dmitrieva T.V., Kucyna N.P., Bezrodnykh A.A., Strokova V.V., Markova I.Yu. Efficiency of reinforcement of technological soil by mineral modifiers. Vestnik Belgorodskogo Gosudarstvennogo Tekhnologicheskogo Universiteta im. V.G. Shukhova. 2019. No. 7, pp. 14–23. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34031/article_5d14bdcc8eca43.21244159
12. Gayda Yu.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M., Malkov V.S., Fomchenkov M.A. Organic mineral additive for strengthening sandy soils. Promyshlennoe i Grazhdanskoe Stroitel’stvo. 2015. No. 11, pp. 25–29. (In Russian).
13. Sokolova Yu.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M. Evaluation of dispersion interaction in aluminum silicate system under the influence of organic additive. Fizika i Khimiya Obrabotki Materialov. 2017. No. 4, pp. 83–88. (In Russian).
14. Sokolova Y.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M., Frolova M.A., Strokova V.V. Kinetic description of heterogeneous processes using surface tension as an information parameter. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1400. Iss. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1400/7/077054
15. Danilov V.E., Korolev E.V., Aizenshtadt A.M., Strokova V.V. Features of the calculation of free energy of the surface based on the model for interfacial interaction of Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble. Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction Materials]. 2019. No. 11, pp. 66–72. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2019-776-11-66-72
16. Ariawan D., Mohd Ishak Z.A., Salim M.S., Mat Taib R., Ahmad Thirmizir M.Z. Wettability and interfacial characterization of alkaline treated kenaf fiber-unsaturated polyester composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. Polymer Composites. 2017. Vol. 38. Iss. 3, pp. 507–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23609
17. Sun X., Mei C., French A.D., Wang Y., Wu Q. Surface wetting behavior of nanocellulose-based composite films. Cellulose. 2018. Vol. 25. No. 9, pp. 5071–5087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1927-8
18. Wang C., Xian Y., Smith L.M., Cheng H., Zhang S. Interfacial properties of bamboo fiber-reinforced high-density polyethylene composites by different methods for adding nano calcium carbonate. Polymers. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 11, pp. 587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9110587
19. Pokrovskaya E.N., Portnov F.A. Thermodynamic optimization of modifiers of the surface layer of wood. Pozharovzryvobezopasnost’. 2017. Vol. 26. No. 5, pp. 29–36. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18322/PVB.2017.26.05.29-36
20. Gusev B.V., Grishina A.N., Korolev E.V. Characteristics of the structure formation of gypsum binder modified with zinc hydrosilicates. Promyshlen-noe i Grazhdanskoe Stroitel’stvo. 2020. No. 2, pp. 40–46. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33622/0869-7019.2020.02.40-46
21. Gayda J.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M., Tutygin A.S., Frolova M.A. Organic-Mineral Aggregate for Sandy Subsoil Strengthening. The 3rd International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics: Procedia Engineering, Advances in Transportation Geotechnics 3. Guimaraes. 2016. Vol. 143, pp. 90–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.012
For citation: Sokolova Yu.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M., Korolev E.V., Chibisov A.A. Evaluation of the influence of prescription factors on the structure formation of polymer-organic binder. Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction Materials]. 2020. No. 9, pp. 27–36. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2020-784-9-27-36