AbstractAbout AuthorsReferences
In building materials science to obtain a general model of the developed material, methods of mathematical planning of the experiment are often used. The key objective here is to reduce the alternatives, that is, the reasonable choice of material components. For composite materials, as complex technical systems, the manifestation of the integrative property, providing non-additive effect of the properties of the components on the properties of the composite due to the structure formation at the interface, is characteristics. In this regard, it is rational to use the data on the surface tension of the material (the free energy of the surface of the material area unit ) as an integral criterion of compatibility of components. This specified informational parameter is determined by a non-destructive way, for example, is calculated by the model of the interfacial interaction of the Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble on the basis of experimentally determined static contact angles of wetting of the test material surface with working liquids. However, currently the scientific community raises questions about the eligibility of these angles for calculation in connection with the ambiguous interpretation of the equilibrium state of the system formed by powdery materials. Therefore, the aim of this work is the demonstration of how the duration of the establishment of mechanical equilibrium in the system of the working fluid – the surface of the solid body studied and the choice of method of measurement can affect the value of the static contact angle of wetting, calculated on the basis of their surface tension. Recommendations for the preparation of press-samples from fine powders and time periods of measurement of the edge angles by working liquids of high and low viscosity are proposed. A proof of the competence of the use of static contact angles for the selected working fluids (decane, ethylene glycol, glycerin, water), subject to the recommendations on the time periods of measurement to be determined in preliminary experiments with the use of the analyzed surface of the test samples has been got.
V.E. DANILOV1, Candidate of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
E.V. KOROLEV2, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
A.M. AYZENSHTADT1, Doctor of Sciences (Chemistry), (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
V.V. STROKOVA3, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
E.V. KOROLEV2, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
A.M. AYZENSHTADT1, Doctor of Sciences (Chemistry), (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
V.V. STROKOVA3, Doctor of Sciences (Engineering) (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)
1 Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (17, Severnaya Dvina Embankment, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation)
2 National Recearch Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (26, Yaroslavskoye Highway, Moscow, 129337, Russian Federation)
3 Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shoukhov (46, Kostyukova Street, Belgorod, 308012, Russian Federation)
1. Bazhenov Yu.M., Gar’kina I.A., Danilov A.M., Korolev E.V. Sistemnyi analiz v stroitel’nom materialovedenii [System analysis in building materials science]. Moscow: MGSU. 2012. 432 p.
2. Gar’kina I.A., Danilov A.M., Korolev E.V. Design and optimization of the properties of complex systems. Regional’naya arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo. 2018. 4 (37), pp. 5–11. (In Russian).
3. Korolev E.V., Bazhenov Yu.M., Al’bakasov A.I. Radiatsionno-zashchitnye i khimicheski stoikie sernye stroitel’nye materialy [Radiation-protective and chemical-resistant sulfur construction materials]. Penza, Orenburg: IPK OGU. 2010. 364 p.
4. Chernyshov E.M. Modern building materials science: the evolution of methodologies and the fundamental nature of scientific knowledge. Materials of the international scientific-practical conference-seminar. Volgo-grad: VGASU. 2004, pp. 20–25. (In Russian).
5. Mchedlov-Petrosyan O.P. Khimiya neorganicheskikh stroitel’nykh materialov [Chemistry of inorganic building materials]. Moscow: Stroyizdat. 1988. 304 p.
6. Kharitonov A.M. Development of methods for optimizing the composition of multicomponent building composites. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2015. No. 11–3, pp. 520–523. (In Russian).
7. Danilov V.E., Aizenshtadt A.M., Frolova M.A., Tutygin A.S. Change in surface energy – a criterion for optimizing the composition of a cementless composite binder. Materialovedenie. 2018. No. 2, pp. 39–44. (In Russian).
8. Korolev E.V., Grishina A.N., Pustovgar A.P. Surface tension in structure formation of materials. Significance, calculation, and application. Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction materials]. 2017. No. 1–2, pp. 104–108. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2017-745-1-2-104-108.
9. Danilov V.E., Strokova V.V., Aizenshtadt A.M. The role of dispersion and polarization effects in the formation of a wood-mineral composite based on finely dispersed components. Fizika i khimiya obrabotki materialov. 2018. No. 4, pp. 50–56. (In Russian).
10. Tarasenko A.D., Dulina O.A., Bukanov A.M. The effect of non-polymer components of the rubber composition on the surface properties of elastomeric compositions. Tonkie khimicheskie tekhnologii. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 5, pp. 67–72. (In Russian).
11. H. Yildirim Erbil. The debate on the dependence of apparent contact angles on drop contact area or three-phase contact line: A review. Surface Science Reports. 2014. Vol. 69. Iss. 4, pp. 325–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2014.09.001
12. Tommi Huhtamäki, Xuelin Tian, Juuso T. Korhonen and Robin H.A. Ras. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nature Protocols. 2018. Vol. 13, pp. 1521–1538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z
13. Jaroslaw Drelich. Guidelines to measurements of reproducible contact angles using a sessile-drop technique. Surface Innovations. 2013. Vol. 1. Iss. 4, pp. 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1680/si.13.00010
14. Jaroslaw W. Drelich. Contact angles: From past mistakes to new developments through liquid-solid adhesion measurements. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2019. Vol. 267, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.02.002
15. Ström G., Frederikson M., Stenius P. Contact angles, work of adhesion and interfacial tensions at a dissolving hydrocarbon surface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1987. Vol. 119. Iss. 2, pp. 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(87)90280-3
16. Joseph J. Jasper The surface tension of pure liquid compounds. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. 1972. Vol. 1, No. 841. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3253106
17. Barsan ME (2007) NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, DHHS (NIOSH). Publication No. 2005-149. NIOSH Publications, US.
2. Gar’kina I.A., Danilov A.M., Korolev E.V. Design and optimization of the properties of complex systems. Regional’naya arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo. 2018. 4 (37), pp. 5–11. (In Russian).
3. Korolev E.V., Bazhenov Yu.M., Al’bakasov A.I. Radiatsionno-zashchitnye i khimicheski stoikie sernye stroitel’nye materialy [Radiation-protective and chemical-resistant sulfur construction materials]. Penza, Orenburg: IPK OGU. 2010. 364 p.
4. Chernyshov E.M. Modern building materials science: the evolution of methodologies and the fundamental nature of scientific knowledge. Materials of the international scientific-practical conference-seminar. Volgo-grad: VGASU. 2004, pp. 20–25. (In Russian).
5. Mchedlov-Petrosyan O.P. Khimiya neorganicheskikh stroitel’nykh materialov [Chemistry of inorganic building materials]. Moscow: Stroyizdat. 1988. 304 p.
6. Kharitonov A.M. Development of methods for optimizing the composition of multicomponent building composites. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2015. No. 11–3, pp. 520–523. (In Russian).
7. Danilov V.E., Aizenshtadt A.M., Frolova M.A., Tutygin A.S. Change in surface energy – a criterion for optimizing the composition of a cementless composite binder. Materialovedenie. 2018. No. 2, pp. 39–44. (In Russian).
8. Korolev E.V., Grishina A.N., Pustovgar A.P. Surface tension in structure formation of materials. Significance, calculation, and application. Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction materials]. 2017. No. 1–2, pp. 104–108. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2017-745-1-2-104-108.
9. Danilov V.E., Strokova V.V., Aizenshtadt A.M. The role of dispersion and polarization effects in the formation of a wood-mineral composite based on finely dispersed components. Fizika i khimiya obrabotki materialov. 2018. No. 4, pp. 50–56. (In Russian).
10. Tarasenko A.D., Dulina O.A., Bukanov A.M. The effect of non-polymer components of the rubber composition on the surface properties of elastomeric compositions. Tonkie khimicheskie tekhnologii. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 5, pp. 67–72. (In Russian).
11. H. Yildirim Erbil. The debate on the dependence of apparent contact angles on drop contact area or three-phase contact line: A review. Surface Science Reports. 2014. Vol. 69. Iss. 4, pp. 325–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2014.09.001
12. Tommi Huhtamäki, Xuelin Tian, Juuso T. Korhonen and Robin H.A. Ras. Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements. Nature Protocols. 2018. Vol. 13, pp. 1521–1538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0003-z
13. Jaroslaw Drelich. Guidelines to measurements of reproducible contact angles using a sessile-drop technique. Surface Innovations. 2013. Vol. 1. Iss. 4, pp. 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1680/si.13.00010
14. Jaroslaw W. Drelich. Contact angles: From past mistakes to new developments through liquid-solid adhesion measurements. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2019. Vol. 267, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.02.002
15. Ström G., Frederikson M., Stenius P. Contact angles, work of adhesion and interfacial tensions at a dissolving hydrocarbon surface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 1987. Vol. 119. Iss. 2, pp. 352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(87)90280-3
16. Joseph J. Jasper The surface tension of pure liquid compounds. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. 1972. Vol. 1, No. 841. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3253106
17. Barsan ME (2007) NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, DHHS (NIOSH). Publication No. 2005-149. NIOSH Publications, US.
For citation: Danilov V.E., Korolev E.V., Ayzenshtadt A.M., Strokova V.V. Features of the calculation of free energy of the surface based on the model for interfacial interaction of Owens–Wendt–Rabel–Kaelble. Stroitel’nye Materialy [Construction Materials]. 2019. No. 11, pp. 66–72. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31659/0585-430X-2019-776-11-66-72